查看單個文章
舊 2009-06-15, 12:13 PM   #44
金毛毛E46M3
正式會員
 
註冊日期: 2008-03-12
住址: L.A
文章: 441
精華: 0
車型: E46 M3
中山北路E92 M3...

FYI
The law varies from place to place, without knowing WHERE this happend, you cant get a good answer.
Now in Las Vegas, the law is very clear, anybody not in a crosswalk is taking their life in their hands, if you hit somebody not in a crosswalk, you don';t even get a ticket.
Old codgers going for groceries get killed all the time.
簡潔翻譯 拉斯維加斯已經通過法案
凡是沒有走在斑馬線上過馬路的路人背撞
活該 駕駛完全沒有刑責
如果想要看更多美國撞死人但是因為路人違規橫越馬路而免責的消息我可以多找一些

[br][br]-=-=-=-=- 以下內容由 金毛毛E46M32009年06月15日 00:19pm 時新增 -=-=-=-=-
部分州都慢慢往這方向走 原因是
70 80年代很多窮人 像在佛羅里達和一些落後地方
真的很愛隨意穿越馬路讓人撞
詐領保險金

案例二
The pedestrian was illegally crossing the road, and is totally at fault here. Your friend DID try to avoid the accident (which IS his responsibility, even if the other guy is being inept) so he should be not found at fault here. Your friend should not be found legally liable.
You stated 5 lane highway. If this were an interstate freeway [ex.I-95 or Interstate 241] your friend is not at fault. Pedestrians are not permitted here. If it were a state highway or local rd, then most likely the pedestrian is guilty of j-walking. This puts your friend not at fault again. Cross-walks are for a reason, and it sounds like the victim should have been using one.

Cross-walks are for a reason!!!!!
路人們別忘了斑馬線的存在
金毛毛E46M3 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章