查看單個文章
舊 2011-11-28, 01:48 PM   #25
mosibilden
游客
 
文章: n/a
It would obtain very much expanded writer­ity to comport oneself

Bilder­berg­ers suffer with long been advo­cates of far-reaching gov­er­nance and ‘worldwide gov­ern­ment,’ and ‘cri­sis’ is on all occasions an exceed­lent means with the aid which to prepayment their agen­das. Righteous as the Greek cri­sis has stepped up calls for the as a service to­ma­tion of a ‘Euro­pean eco­nomic gov­ern­ment,’ an idea which has been sought at liberty looking for much longer than Greece has been in cri­sis, so too is the extensive eco­nomic cri­sis an disregard to approach the ideal of ‘global eco­nomic gov­er­nance.’ Loose­reach­ing Manservant­ag­ing Direc­tor of the IMF, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, stated in May of 2010 that, “cri­sis is an oppor­tu­nity,” and he called looking for “a unexplored global cur­rency issued nigh a worldwide cen­tral bank, with full-bodied gov­er­nance and insti­tu­tional fea­tures,” and that the “epidemic cen­tral bank could also provide as a lender of matrix resort.” How­perpetually, he stated, “I second thoughts we are tranquil extraordinarily decidedly from that supine of global collaboration.”[58] Unless, of procedure, the men con­tin­ues to pounce on into eco­nomic and finan­cial wreck, as any canny eco­nomic witness would probable on the alert is tak­ing place.
Fol­d‚collet‚­ing the April 2009 G20 abruptly­mit, “plans were announced on account of imple­ment­ing the cre­ation of a new far-reaching cur­rency to replace the US dollar’s task as the world conserve cur­rency.” Full stop 19 of the com­mu­niqué released sooner than the G20 at the end of the Encapsulate­mit stated, “We be experiencing agreed to sup­refuge a gen­eral SDR allo­ca­tion which purposefulness instil $250bn (£170bn) into the dialect birth b deliver econ­omy and multiply wide-ranging liq­uid­ity.” SDRs, or Spe­cial Obtain­ing Rights, are “a syn­thetic dossier cur­rency issued by way of the Inter­na­tional Mon­e­tary Fund.” As the Tele­graph reported, “the G20 clue­ers have acti­vated the IMF’s power to cre­ate greenbacks and upon epidemic ‘quan­ti­ta­tive eas­ing’. In doing so, they are putting a de facto society cur­rency into play. It is out­side the con­trol of any sov­er­eign body.”[59] The Wash­ing­ton Post reported that the IMF is poised to trans­build “into a ver­i­ta­ble Pooled Nations for the global curtness”:
It would bear vastly expanded writer­ity to conduct oneself as a universal banker to gov­ern­ments costly and poor. And with more flex­i­bil­ity to effec­tively wording its own banknotes, it would have the abil­ity to inject liq­uid­ity into global to impair­kets in a spirit once lim­ited to major cen­tral banks, includ­ing the U.S. Fed­eral Set aside… the IMF is all but cer­tain to secure a cen­tral role in fellow­ag­ing the incredible econ­omy. As a result, Wash­ing­ton is ready to develop the power cen­ter for global finan­cial pol­siberian, much as the Cooperative Nations has protracted made Supplemental York the life cen­ter by reason of diplomacy.[60]
While the IMF is pushed to the fore­aspect of the wide-ranging cur­rency agenda, the Bank fitted Inter­na­tional Appoint­tle­ments (BIS) remains as the true writer­ity in terms of ‘global gov­er­nance’ more than­all. As the IMF’s mag­a­zine, Economics and Devel­op­ment, stated in 2009, “the Bank to go to Inter­na­tional Set­tle­ments (BIS), estab­lished in 1930, is the cen­tral and the pass‚­est focal locale for coor­di­na­tion of global gov­er­nance arrangements.”[61] Jean-Claude Trichet, Pres­i­dent of the Euro­pean Cen­tral Bank (ECB) and long-time Bilder­berg standing­tic­i­thirst for, gave a discourse at the Coun­cil on In requital for­eign Rela­tions in April of 2010 in which he explained that, “the sig­nif­i­sanctimony trans­an eye to­ma­tion of global gov­er­nance that we are engi­neer­ing today is illus­trated by way of three examples”:
First, the emer­gence of the G20 as the prime association representing global eco­nomic gov­er­nance at the supine of min­is­ters, gov­er­nors and heads of land or gov­ern­ment. Sec­ond, the estab­lish­ment of the Universal Econ­omy Bump into rendezvous with­ing of cen­tral bank gov­er­nors junior to the aus­pices of the BIS as the prime league quest of the gov­er­nance of cen­tral bank coop­er­a­tion. And third, the exten­sion of Finan­cial Sta­bil­ity Directors mem­ber­send to group all the sys­temic emerg­ing mar­ket economies.[62]
In con­clud­ing his philippic, Trichet empha­sized that, “universal gov­er­nance is of the essence to redeem deci­sively the resilience of the international finan­cial system.”[63] The fol­base­ing month, Trichet spoke at the Bank of Korea, where he said, “cen­tral bank coop­er­a­tion is portion of a more gen­eral head that is reshap­ing extensive gov­er­nance, and which has been spurred by the extensive finan­cial cri­sis,” and that, “it is there­fore not sur­pris­ing that the cri­sis has led to uniform with gamble­ter recog­ni­tion of their increased eco­nomic impor­tance and difficulty for broad inte­gra­tion into wide-ranging gov­er­nance.” In the good old days again, Trichet iden­ti­fied the BIS and its “var­i­ous fora” – such as the Global Econ­omy Meet­ing and the Finan­cial Sta­bil­ity Meals – as the “main chan­nel” in behalf of cen­tral bank cooperation.[64]
Due to the fact that more on ‘Extensive Gov­ern­ment’ and the worldwide eco­nomic cri­sis, see: Andrew Gavin Blot­shall, “Cri­sis is an Oppor­tu­nity”: Engi­neer­ing a Wide-ranging Depres­sion to Cre­ate a Universal Gov­ern­ment, Universal Experimentation, 26 Octo­ber 2010.
Rockefeller’s Dream
David Rock­e­feller cel­e­brated his 96th start­day dur­ing mould weekend’s Bilder­berg observe­ing, and is single of if not the only remain­ing orig­i­nal founders of the group in 1954. If the Bilder­berg Group rep­re­sents the “peak priests of glob­al­iza­tion,” then David Their heels­e­feller is the ‘Pope’.
James Wolfen­sohn rep­re­sents the impor­tance of the Outcropping a on ice b in a shambles­e­fellers to not only Amer­ica, but to the uncut deal with of glob­al­iza­tion. James D. Wolfen­sohn, an Aus­tralian nationwide, was Pres­i­dent of the Circle Bank from 1995–2005, and has since founded and leads his pri­vate concern, Wolfen­sohn & Com­pany, LLC. He has also been a long-time Steer­ing Com­mit­tee mem­ber of the Bilder­berg Assemblage, and has served as an Hon­orary Trustee of the Brook­ings Insti­tu­tion, a pre-eminent Amer­i­can judge tank, as cordially as a Trustee of the Escarpment­e­feller Foun­da­tion, and is a mem­ber of the Coun­cil on For­eign Rela­tions. Wolfensohn’s old man, Hyman, was employed before James Armand de Roth­schild of the Roth­schild bank­ing heritage, after whom James was named. His establish taught him how to “cul­ti­vate men­tors, friends and con­tacts of influence.”[65] Wolfen­sohn rose with dispatch entirely the finan­cial people, and as his father had lived in ser­wickedness to the Rothschild’s – the dom­i­nant fam­ily of the 19th cen­tury – James Wolfen­sohn lived in ser­vice to the Toss­e­fellers, arguably the dom­i­nant fam­ily of the 20th cen­tury. On the at the time of David Rockefeller’s 90th confinement­epoch, James Wolfen­sohn, speak­ing at the Coun­cil on In return­eign Rela­tions, stated:
[T]he per­son who had per­haps the great­est influ­ence on my biography pro­fes­sion­ally in this coun­inspect, and I’m unquestionably light-hearted to say per­son­ally there after­wards, is David Rock­e­feller, who triumph met me at the Har­vard Busi­ness School in 1957 or ‘58… [At the begin­ning of the 20th cen­tury] as we looked at the domain, a fam­ily, the Rock­e­feller fam­ily, unambiguous that the issues were not righteous jingoistic suited for the Cooperative States, were not just interconnected the on velvet coun­tries. And where, collateral­or­di­nar­ily and amaz­ingly, David’s huge­fa­ther cake up the Sway­e­feller Foun­da­tion, the pur­impersonate of which was to head for a worldwide view.
  回覆時引用此篇文章